|
Source: Heartland Institute
April 29, 2016
Climate Realists Fight AGs’
Fishing Expedition
by H.
Sterling Burnett, Ph.D. is a Heartland research fellow on
environmental policy
and managing
Climate
Change Weekly #211
In the Climate Change Weekly released April 5 (CCW 209), I
discussed the press conference held by a group of state attorneys general (AG),
led by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, threatening investigations
and possible prosecutions of climate skeptics for speaking their mind. Just
days after I wrote that article, on April 7, a subpoena was served on the
Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) by Claude Walker, attorney general of
the U.S. Virgin Islands. The subpoena demands CEI produce emails, statements,
drafts, and other documents regarding its work on climate change and energy
policy, including private donor information, from 1997 through 2007. Walker
gave CEI until April 30, 2016 to produce this decades’ worth of material.
CEI responded swiftly and forcefully to the subpoena. CEI General Counsel
Sam Kazman issued a statement saying, “CEI will vigorously fight to quash this
subpoena. It is an affront to our First Amendment rights of free speech and
association for Attorney General Walker to bring such intimidating demands
against a nonprofit group. If Walker and his allies succeed, the real victims
will be all Americans, whose access to affordable energy will be hit by one
costly regulation after another, while scientific and policy debates are wiped
out one subpoena at a time.”
Shortly after CEI received its subpoena, DCI Group, a Washington, DC-based
public relations and lobbying firm that has had fossil fuel industry clients,
became the third organization to receive subpoenas from the Virgin Islands’ AG,
joining CEI and Exxon, which previously had been served subpoenas from
Schneiderman and Walker.
These subpoenas are a fishing expedition with no hope of finding anything
remotely illegal since it is not illegal to fund climate research or debate
climate science or policy. This harassment is an attempt to silence critics of
climate alarmism and the policies of the Obama administration and various
states.
Interestingly, using Vermont’s public records law, the Energy &
Environment Legal Institute (EELI) has discovered evidence the state AGs had
been collaborating with radical anti-fossil-fuel groups who provided
information and strategy advice to the AGs while urging them to pursue
litigation against their political opponents. The documents also show the AGs
actively sought to hide the anti-fossil-fuel groups’ involvement. EELI’s
executive director, Craig Richardson, said in a press release, “These emails
strongly suggest the financial motive for AGs to pursue their political
opponents, not content with merely silencing and scaring away support for those
who dare disagree with their extreme global warming agenda. Alarmingly,
government officials are actively trying to cover up their coordination by
using a Common Interest Agreement, even to claw back records already
circulated, which another attorney general properly objected to as violating
state law.”
The Heartland Institute, like CEI, has long been a champion of sound climate
science and is a leader in the fight against flawed, dangerous, climate
policies. Although I don’t’ relish the thought of Heartland being entangled in
misguided and ultimately costly litigation, I have been surprised Heartland has
yet to be served with a similar subpoena. It brings to mind the situation of
Henry David Thoreau when jailed for the act of civil disobedience for failing
to pay poll taxes. Thoreau felt the poll tax was unjust and used to support
unjust policies and causes. Ralph Waldo Emerson, a fellow writer, mentor, and
friend, reportedly visited Thoreau in jail asking, “Henry, what are you doing
in there?” Thoreau replied, “Waldo, the question is what are you doing out
there?”
While I’m glad we are not party to a lawsuit, I’m left asking, “Why not
us?”
-- H. Sterling Burnett
SOURCES: Competitive Enterprise Institute; Financial Times; and Energy & Environment Legal Institute
posted 09 April 2016
|
Excerpt from text:
These subpoenas are a fishing expedition with no hope of finding anything
remotely illegal since it is not illegal to fund climate research or debate
climate science or policy. This harassment is an attempt to silence critics of
climate alarmism and the policies of the Obama administration and various
states.
|
|